The Library Book — by Susan Orlean

Have you found yourself thinking, “I need to read a nice ode to public libraries”? Well, you’re in luck. Orlean (staff writer at the New Yorker for a number of years) had vowed to herself that she was done writing books. As she puts it, writing a book on any given topic is like a “slow motion wrestling match.” Here she spends a good part of a decade wrestling and exploring the circumstances around a fire that consumed much of the Downtown branch of the Los Angeles Public Library in April, 1986.

Was it arson? Maybe. Did the authorities catch the guilty party? Maybe. Did justice prevail and an innocent man was set free? Maybe. You decide. It’s like a choose-your-own-adventure tale!

What is known about the LAPL fire is that it was, and still is, the worst library fire in American history. 400,000 books burned, another 700,000 were damaged by smoke and/or water. Devastating.

Threaded through the story of the LAPL fire, a specific event at a particular time and place, Orlean pulls together the various threads of library history, library philosophy, the public library’s rather unique place in American culture and incorporates a fair bit of library humor to stitch together the story of an institution that is simultaneously fragile and extremely resilient.

Even if I weren’t a public librarian, I would still give this five stars. It’s Orlean’s best work to date. You can find a copy at your local public library: http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1085572852

 

 

Local politics

I’m not at all sure if any of the following will have any impact one way or another, but it seems that giving money to local campaigns and candidates that I support just isn’t getting the results I would like to see. As humans are wont to do when facing a problem, I have devised a plan of action.

I’ll be printing up a batch of door hangers and I’ll spend an hour or so each week between now and November affixing them to my neighbors’ doors. On Sundays I might also focus on the windshields of cars in church parking lots with slightly amended wording that would appeal more to the righteous crowd.

If folks want to have their own version of this printed up, feel free to copy/paste and put in your own name and location. I’d be happy to be the courier once I get the initial template set up and the printing figured out. According to my reading of the Public Disclosure Commission (https://www.pdc.wa.gov/learn/publications/political-advertising-guide), such an effort doesn’t require any personal information disclosure as long as I don’t spend more than $100 dollars on the effort.

So. Here we go. Here’s the text of of the piece:

Hi, neighbor! 

My name is Mark. I live on Madison Street on the Lower South Hill and I love my neighborhood. I also love Spokane. As you are probably aware, we have an election coming up this November. 

Here are three races that are of particular importance to me:

The mayoral race. Candidate Nadine Woodward has proposed banning the homeless from using the Spokane Public Library. This idea would not only be illegal and highly impractical to implement, it’s just flat-out uncompassionate. She also went on record to say we don’t need more shelter space for the homeless. Hmm. Reality would seem to indicate otherwise. Spokane needs a practical and compassionate person in the Mayor’s office so I’m voting for Ben Stuckart. Please join me.

City Council president race. Candidate Cindy Wendle has no political or public policy experience and yet she wants to lead the legislative arm of our city government. Her campaign web page lists being a UW Husky fan growing up in Pullman and driving a Chevrolet as a member of the Wendle Ford family as two of her major diplomatic accomplishments… hmm. Right. Conversely, Breean Beggs has a long history of working to improve Spokane through thoughtful leadership, action and legislation. Join me in voting for Breean Beggs.

School board race. A comparison of candidate Katy Treloar’s platform with Nikki Lockwood’s shows that Treloar is short on the specifics of what exactly she would be advocating for in our schools. Lockwood’s stances on special education, racial equity, discipline reform, and safety show a well thought out approach and level of transparency and accountability that Treloar is lacking. Join me in voting for Nikki Lockwood. 

Not registered to vote yet? It’s an easy process. Just go to https://olvr.votewa.gov/and get signed up. October 28th is the deadline to register.

This piece of paper is paid for with my own dang money. Not a PAC, not a lobbying firm, not a union, not an industry association, just a neighbor who wants Spokane (and the people in it) to thrive.

Range : Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World — by David Epstein

We live in an age of specialization. In a specialized world, the dominant narrative is that we need to find our area of focus early and stick with it. Think Malcom Gladwell’s Outliers book about putting in 10,000 hours of practice to achieve proficiency. What Epstein reveals is that the “specialize early” approach only works to a certain degree in some fields and to lesser degrees in others.

An example: learning to play chess. Chess, as Epstein describes it, is a “kind world” type of problem to solve. Through repetition and practice, players can garner near-immediate feedback on their decisions and strategy, allowing them to re-evaluate and reflect. Most of life, however, isn’t a “kind world” problem. In Epstein’s vernacular, most of life falls into a “wicked” world scenario. Not “wicked” in an evil way, just one that is more complicated and often lacks the immediate feedback of hitting a golf ball and knowing to adjust a swing.

In a “wicked” world of situations, being a generalist and having a broad background of knowledge to draw upon is not a drawback or a liability, it’s an essential ingredient in being able to solve problems that are ill-defined in their scope.